Double Jacket Hose Factory

August 11, 2021

The high court said that setting up of

The court then commented that everything seems okay on the paper but practically nothing would be done.M.Mumbai: The Bombay high court has appointed a three-member judicial committee to probe the Kamala Mills fire incident as well as to see how such incidents can be avoided in the future.Court rejects bail pleas of 11 accused in caseA sessions court on Friday rejected the bail applications of eleven accused arrested in connection with the massive fire at Kamala Mills compound, which killed 14 persons.â€"This committee shall go into the root of the fire incident. The committee has been set up in order to avoid repetition of such incidents in future,â€ the court ordered..The court posted the petition for hearing next week when the names of the members would be finalised. The court clarified that a retired HC judge, an architect of the HC panel and a retired bureaucrat or retired member of the urban development department or secretary of the town planning department would be a part of the committee.Sessions judge A.

Borde and Justice Rajesh Ketkar was hearing the PIL filed by Mr Ribeiro. Yawalkar rejected the bail applications filed by Lisbon Lopes, Kevin Bawa , Ramesh Gowani , Ravi Bhandari , Utkarsh Pandey , Yug Pathak and Yug Tuli , Rajendra Patil , Jigar Sanghvi, Kripesh Sanghvi and Abhijit Mankar .On Friday, the court, while dictating its order, said, "Such incidents should not be repeated in the future.The court was China fire couplings manufacturers hearing a PIL filed by retired commissioner of police Julio Ribeiro, who sought that a judicial committee be set up under the Commissions of Inquiry Act to probe the Kamala Mills fire of December 29, 2017 and expose illegalities of restaurant owners as well as Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation officers on Thursday. The BMC had opposed the committee, but the state had left the decision to the court. The high court said that setting up of a judicial committee was the domain of the state governmentâ€¦ Hence, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we need to have an independent probe.

On the other hand, special public prosecutor Prakash Shetty objected the pleas, saying the accused had knowledge that such incidents could occur at any moment but failed to take precautionary steps.L.A division bench of Justice R.The defence lawyers of almost all the accused had contended that section 304 is not applicable on this case because the accused did not have the intention to cause the deaths of anybody. On Thursday, BMC and the state government had mentioned forth steps taken by them after the fire and a future plan to prevent such incidents. 14 people were killed and over 30 injured when the fire broke out at two restaurants â€” 1 Above and Mojos Bistro â€” at Kamala Mills compound in central Mumbai. They had contended that, at most, they could have been charged for 304 , a bailable offence

Posted by: inhosacse at 03:08 AM | No Comments | Add Comment
Post contains 493 words, total size 3 kb.

Hide Comments | Add Comment